Category: Pirate Movement

The Leadership of The European Pirate Party Casts Doubt on Pirates’ Right to Criticize Party Officials

Το έμβλημα του Κόμματος Πειρατών Ελλάδας The emblem of the Pirate Party of Greece

The Leadership of The European Pirate Party Casts Doubt on Pirates’ Right to Criticize Party Officials 

The Pirate Movement is ostensibly a movement that stands for free speech, free criticism, free scrutiny, transparency and accountability of those in power, including party officials. Israel’s genocidal campaign against Gaza, however, laid bare the hypocrisy of the hegemonic powers within our movement. We witnessed some of the highest-ranking officers of the German Pirate Party (Piratenpartei Deutschland – PPDE) adopt and amplify far-right racist and bigoted rhetoric and conspiracy theories against the Palestinians and Muslims in general, as well as falsehoods against UNRWA and the International Criminal Court. 

We witnessed in disbelief, dismay, and horror the deafening silence of the European Pirate Party (PPEU) and the Pirate Parties International (PPI) as this genocide unfolded, as tens of thousands of unarmed Palestinian civilians, with the majority being women and children, were massacred and maimed; as doctors, nurses, medics, rescue teams, humanitarian aid workers, journalists were murdered, abducted, and tortured; as foreign journalists, academics, artists, politicians who dared call for a ceasefire, who dared say that Palestinians are human beings were brutalized, defamed, cancelled, sacked from their jobs, arrested, harassed, exiled. Despite all the evidence, despite all that has transpired, the PPEU and the PPI chose to act as if nothing was happening or as if what was happening did not matter.

This is, of course, no coincidence. It is no secret that both entities are controlled by parties that are completely aligned with the far-right Israeli apartheid regime and have fully adopted its narrative. We Pirates love to boast that we are all about “evidence-based politics”. Yet, the powers that be in the PPEU and the PPI choose to disregard and dismiss the mounting evidence that the situation Palestinians have been placed in since the Nakba of 1948 is a brutal apartheid; that the occupation of the Palestinian territories is illegal; that the Palestinians are subjected to a legal system that treats them as second-class subjects and that they are citizens only in name; that Israel subjects them to arbitrary detentions and tortures them; that Israel’s government officials and prominent TV anchors call for a genocide, even for employing gas chambers[1] against the Palestinians.

This conduct of the PPEU and the PPI should come as no surprise; in the three-part “Quo Vaditis, Piratae?” series of official statements from our Governing Board, available in both Greek[2][3][4] and English,[5][6][7] we have documented, detailed, and highlighted a number of serious pathogenies and failings of our movement’s European and International bodies, as well as certain disgraceful incidents involving the PPEU’s “locomotive”, the PPDE. It must be noted here that, without the tolerance and – yes – complicity of other PPEU and PPI member parties, things would have been completely different. The sad reality is that none of the PPEU and the PPI’s Board members have had the rectitude and fortitude to take a stand. There seems to be a tacit agreement for Pirates to either stay silent in the face of unethical, unbecoming of a Pirate, behaviour and blatant deviations from humanitarian principles or resign.

Indeed, many high-profile, esteemed Pirates left the Pirate Movement because they could no longer tolerate behaviours like the ones we mentioned: Andrew Norton, Martin Delius, Felix Reda,[8] Florie Marie, Birgitta Jnsdóttir, Mikuláš Peksa, and so on. The ones who allowed, enabled, or even orchestrated the ethical and political decline remained and, infuriatingly, were essentially rewarded. 

This brings us to the situation in Gaza and the rest of the illegally Occupied Palestinian Territories. The Boards of the PPEU and the PPI seem to treat the illegal occupation as legal, which is in and of itself a violation of resolutions of the UN General Assembly and UN Security Council. PPDE officials like Schoresch Davoodi even praised conservative German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’ intention to ignore the ICC’s arrest warrant against war criminal Netanyahu, shunning Germany’s obligations under international law.

As far as we are concerned, we did not stay silent. Furthermore, we filed a motion to the Council of the PPEU to condemn this genocide.[9] We were stonewalled with pathetic excuses, such as the claim that we cannot join the ever-growing throng of experts who speak of genocide, because Israel has not been convicted; or the notion that condemning Israel’s actions would somehow help Hamas, Iran or… Putin. And we are not even discussing the procedural abnormalities and violations that were employed by the Board of the PPEU to sabotage our motion. Frank Wijnans, the leader of the Dutch Pirate Party (Piratenpartij Nederlands – PPNL) and Mark Anthony van Treuren, its foreign policy officer, even went as far as to accuse us of “supporting terrorism” and “bullying” the European Pirate Party. They were duly called out for these actions on social media, by our own official account, i.e. by our Governing Board, not just by individual members. Later, on 12 May 2025, a group of PPNL politicians, led by Catharina Bethlehem and Matthijs Pontier, the PPNL ballot’s top candidate, moved to publish a statement condemning the genocide in Gaza and the silence surrounding it; this statement, however, had not been adopted as official party position.[10]

On 8 May 2025, we saw that Mr. Florian Roussel, chairperson of the PPEU, initiated a vote to refer one of our members to the PPEU’s Code of Conduct Committee for the “crime” of publicly calling party officials out for their public unethical behavior and for their public actions that have harmed the Pirate Movement, its reputation, and its credibility.[11] Mr. Roussel claims that public criticism of public behavior constitutes a “violation of privacy” and that it basically causes “emotional distress” to those criticized. 

We have to inform Mr. Roussel and everyone in the PPEU’s Board and in the other Pirate parties of Europe that:

  • alignment with a belligerent, racist, far-right regime is a violation of Pirate principles, even considering the neo-Lepenist “ni droite, ni gauche“[12][13] dogma that has played a pivotal role in the methodic and systematic ideological and moral derailment of our movement;
  • alignment with a corrupt government that seeks, Orbán-, Trump-, Putin-, and Mitsotakis-like, to control and manipulate the judiciary is a violation of Pirate principles;
  • alignment with an illegal occupation force is a violation of Pirate principles;
  • alignment with an apartheid regime is a violation of Pirate principles;
  • alignment with a government that imposes censorship of the Press domestically and internationally and, like Putin, proscribes, threatens, and persecutes its critics internationally is a violation of Pirate principles;
  • adopting and amplifying racist, dehumanizing rhetoric and justifications for ethnic cleansing and genocide is a violation of Pirate principles;
  • no one is exempted from criticism, private or public, for their public speech and actions;
  • being mentioned by name for something one said in public and with their official capacity as a politician is no violation of their privacy;
  • one can no longer expect to be taken seriously when they claim to be all about free speech, opinion and expression, when, in a vulgar display of anti-democratic, censorious, and unpirate attitude, they seek disciplinary action against Pirates, or even the general public, for criticizing violations and actions harmful to the Pirate Movement and/or incompatible with basic ethics, basic humanity, the Pirate Ideology;
  • it is actions like the ones officially outlined by our party and individually by our members that reduced the PPDE to practical non-existence (0.03% in the 2025 German federal election) and cost the PPEU three of its four European Parliament seats;
  • apartheid is Nazism, as Alpha Blondy had put it so succinctly – so is condoning, enabling, white/pinkwashing, justifying, and supporting it;
  • accusing others of “supporting terrorism” because they recognize Palestinians (who seem to be viewed as Untermenschen by the Global North) as human beings whose rights must be respected is far worse than the fictitious “emotional distress” abusers suffer when others point out their public and well-documented failings;
  • if someone is so thin-skinned, undemocratic, unpirate, and arrogant that, like Trump, Orbán, Putin, and Mitsotakis, they seek to punish, stifle, and censor criticism for what they say in public and for their public actions (especially with Mitsotakis-style passive-aggressive, gaslighting techniques such as claiming that criticism is “emotional violence” and “bullying”), they should stay out of politics altogether – and most certainly have no right whatsoever to be called a Pirate.

We, the Pirate Party of Greece, inform Mr. Roussel and the Board of the PPEU that the accusations he is referring to in his initiative are not made by “one member of the PPGR”; we unequivocally, unanimously, and officially call these officials out for their unethical and unpirate actions, as well as their fanatical support for a genocidal apartheid regime.

We inform him and the Board of the PPEU that we unequivocally, unanimously, and officially stand by not only our members who go out of their way to amplify our voice, but also everyone who is targeted for exercising their right to speak truth to power – Pirate or not. 

What Mr. Roussel is doing here, violating every single democratic principle, is precisely this: an attempt to remove Pirates’ right to hold their leadership accountable. If Mr. Roussel wishes to force us, our members, and other Pirates into silence and make us Netanyahu’s accomplices, accomplices in war crimes and crimes against humanity, we refuse. If Mr. Roussel wishes to remove Pirates’ freedom of speech, opinion, expression, and criticism, we inform him that he is in blatant and clear violation of every single Pirate principle, and we unequivocally, unanimously, and officially condemn his censorious and dangerous initiative. On 1 June 2025, we are holding our 12th Congress. Mr. Roussel’s undemocratic, unpirate move, along with its implications, political, moral, and legal, shall be discussed there, along with everything we have witnessed so far in the PPEU and the PPI. Everything shall be laid bare before our members, who shall decide and determine our future relationship with the PPEU and the PPI – if there can be one. What is certain is that we are not going to follow Mr. Roussel and his supporters in this anti-democratic decline, or offer them any kind of legitimization.

We state that the Pirate Party of Greece has absolutely nothing to apologize or explain itself for. We consistently, unequivocally, unanimously, and in the most official manner stand for peace, human rights, democracy, transparency, accountability. We stand for a truly equal, rules-based international order. For everyone, regardless of color, race, origin or creed. We deplore and denounce those “Pirates” who are bringing infamy to the Pirate Movement by aligning themselves with racism and bigotry, with genocidal, dehumanizing rhetoric and far-right, totalitarian, Jim Crow-style regimes that pose an existential threat not only to populations whose lands they illegally occupy, but also to their neighboring countries. When even the conservative editorial board of the Financial Times condemns the West for its complicity in this genocide,[15] there are no excuses. There can be no spurious claims of “self-defense”, no amoral justifications derived from the obscene Realpolitik playbook that has plunged the world into a state of perpetual war, no Orwellian twisting of the meaning of words, and no daft theories about how “condemnation of Israel’s crimes would help Hamas/Iran/Putin”. 

Furthermore, we have to remind Mr. Roussel, the Boards of the PPEU and the PPI, and everyone else that Pirates believe in diversity, equality, equity, inclusion, and social justice for all – regardless of color, race, origin, or creed. Pirates reject the notion of a racially and religiously homogeneous ethno-state. Pirates are not 4chan/8chan-grade trolls like the callous, racist, sadistic, and machiavellian “UK Lawyers for Israel” pressure group, who had the insolence to claim that Israel’s starvation of Gaza will “reduce obesity” among Palestinians.[15] Pirates do not apply double standards. Pirates do not accept the racist notion that any ethnic or religious group may be viewed as less worthy than any other. Pirates do not accept the notion that any genocide or ethnic cleansing can be excusable, justifiable, acceptable or tolerable, regardless of pretext. Pirates have always rejected the misanthropic cynicism of Realpolitik. Finally, if there is anything that the world ought to have learned from the Holocaust, it is that “Never Again” means “Never Again for ANYONE.”

Sources:

  1. Owen Jones (2025). ‘GAS CHAMBERS’ In Gaza: Prominent Israeli Demands ‘HOLOCAUST’. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgR0wlLViWc [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας (2024). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Μέρος 1ο – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2024/07/quo-vaditis-piratae-meros-1o/.
  1. Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας (2024). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Μέρος 2o – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2024/07/quo-vaditis-piratae-meros-2o/.
  1. Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας (2024). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Μέρος 3o – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2024/09/quo-vaditis-piratae-meros-3o/ [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Pirate Party of Greece (2025). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Part 1 – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/01/quo-vaditis-piratae-part-1/ [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Pirate Party of Greece (2025). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Part 2 – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/quo-vaditis-piratae-part-2/ [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Pirate Party of Greece (2025). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Part 3 – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/quo-vaditis-piratae-part-3/ [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Reda, F. (2019). Warum die Piraten zur Europawahl unwählbar sind: Kandidat Gilles Bordelais. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2qS56P-7kA.‌
  1. European Pirate Party (2024). 17th Council Meeting – PPGR Resolution Course of Action (Pirati Proposal) – Vote. [online] European Pirate Party. Available at: https://discourse.european-pirateparty.eu/t/17th-council-meeting-ppgr-resolution-course-of-action-pirati-proposal-vote/800 [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Redactie (2025). Zwijgen kan niet meer, Israël pleegt genocide en ingrijpen is nodig – Piratenpartij. [online] Piratenpartij. Available at: https://piratenpartij.nl/zwijgen-kan-niet-meer-israel-pleegt-genocide-en-ingrijpen-is-nodig/.
  1. European Pirate Party (2025). Vote on the referral to the Code of Conduct Council. [online] European Pirate Party. Available at: https://discourse.european-pirateparty.eu/t/vote-on-the-referral-to-the-code-of-conduct-council/915/ [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας (2025). Ξεριζώνοντας το νεολεπενισμό από το Πειρατικό Κίνημα – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/xerizonontas-to-neolepenismo-apo-to-peiratiko-kinima/.
  1. Pirate Party of Greece (2025). Uprooting Neo-LePenism from The Pirate Movement – Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/uprooting-neo-lepenism-from-the-pirate-movement/.
  1. Financial Times Editorial Board (2025). The west’s shameful silence on Gaza. [online] @FinancialTimes. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/f5fd6f8d-06a7-4d1f-b842-752e3aca9272 [Accessed 10 May 2025].
  1. Siddique, H. (2025). UK Lawyers for Israel condemned over claim war may reduce obesity in Gaza. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/10/uk-lawyers-for-israel-condemned-over-claim-war-may-reduce-obesity-in-gaza [Accessed 11 May 2025].

This statement was updated on 17 May 2025 to reflect recent developments, and on 1 August 2025 to correct spelling and add context on certain events.

Permanent link to this article: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/05/the-leadership-of-the-european-pirate-party-casts-doubt-on-pirates-right-to-criticize-party-officials/

Η “πειρατεία” δεν αντιμετωπίζεται με πρόστιμα, αλλά με διαθεσιμότητα περιεχομένου

Με ενδιαφέρον και έκπληξη ακούσαμε στο News247, ένα podcast με τίτλο “Πώς θα πέφτουν τα πρόστιμα για το παράνομο downloading;” του δημοσιογράφου Σταύρου Διοσκουρίδη με τον κ. Τίμο Κουρεμένο.

Να ξεκαθαρίσουμε κάτι. Το να κερδίζεις χρήματα εκμεταλλευόμενος την ιδιοκτησία τρίτου χωρίς αυτός να λαμβάνει τίποτα είναι ανήθικο, εκτός από παράνομο. Οπότε, καταλαβαίνουμε απόλυτα και συμφωνούμε με τον νόμο που τιμωρεί όσους πουλάνε περιεχόμενο που δεν τους ανήκει. Το Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας θεωρεί ότι ο δημιουργός του πνευματικού έργου πρέπει να έχει τον πρώτο λόγο στη χρήση και στη διανομή του έργου του. Δυστυχώς αυτό καταστρατηγείται, όχι από τους “πειρατές”, αλλά από την ίδια την βιομηχανία θεάματος και μουσικής καθώς και τους οργανισμούς διαχείρισης πνευματικών δικαιωμάτων, δηλαδή το λόμπι των εκδοτών και των συλλεκτικών-εισπρακτικών εταιρειών. Αυτό είχε αποδειχθεί περίτρανα και από το σκάνδαλο υπεξαίρεσης στην ΑΕΠΙ που για δεκαετίες άφηνε τους δημιουργούς απλήρωτους. Όπως επισήμανε επίσης η Spotify[1], ο βασικός υπαίτιος για τις χαμηλές απολαβές των μουσικών από το έργο τους, είναι η προαιώνια παθογένεια της μουσικής βιομηχανίας, η οποία κυριολεκτικά τους δένει χειροπόδαρα με καταχρηστικά συμβόλαια, με τα οποία τους δίνουν ψίχουλα. Ωστόσο, το λόμπι των εκδοτών παραμένει στο απυρόβλητο.

Η συγκεκριμένη συνέντευξη έβριθε λαθών, κυρίως τεχνικών, αλλά και άλλων. Για παράδειγμα, ο κ. Κουρεμένος είπε ότι οι πλατφόρμες γνωρίζουν ποιοι παρακολουθούν παράνομα το περιεχόμενό τους και έτσι μπορούν να τους βρουν και να βάλουν πρόστιμα οι αρμόδιες αρχές. Μόνο που αυτό δεν ισχύει. Ο εξοπλισμός που πουλάνε οι παράνομοι διακινητές δεν συνδέεται στις πλατφόρμες, αλλά σε υπηρεσίες τρίτων που αναμεταδίδουν το “stream”. Επίσης είπε ότι οι πάροχοι μπορούν να ξέρουν ανά πάσα στιγμή σε ποιες σελίδες πάνε οι χρήστες τους και να κόψουν την πρόσβαση. Αυτό είναι η μισή αλήθεια. Γιατί ο πάροχος μπορεί να ξέρει και να κόψει σελίδες μόνο αν χρησιμοποιούμε τις προεγκατεστημένες ρυθμίσεις σύνδεσης. Αν αλλάξουμε DNS ή χρησιμοποιήσουμε VPN αυτά πάνε… περίπατο. Είναι ο λόγος που μπορούμε πχ από Ελλάδα να δούμε περιεχόμενο για το οποίο το Netflix έχει δικαιώματα προβολής μόνο στις ΗΠΑ. Ένα τελευταίο λάθος είναι ότι οι διευθύνσεις IP είναι συνδεδεμένες με το ΑΦΜ μας. Στην πλειοψηφία των περιπτώσεων δεν ισχύει ούτε αυτό. Μπορούν να ξέρουν πότε χρησιμοποιούσαμε μία IP, αλλά δεν είναι συνδεδεμένες με το ΑΦΜ μας. Η πλειοψηφία των χρηστών χρησιμοποιεί δυναμικές IP που αλλάζουν κάθε λίγες ώρες βάσει της κατανομής που κάνει ο πάροχος. Έχει μάλιστα επισημανθεί πολλές φορές ότι η διεύθυνση IP δεν αποτελεί ικανό στοιχείο για την ταυτοποίηση ενός φυσικού προσώπου, ειδικά στην περίπτωση κοινής χρήσης της ίδιας διεύθυνσης από πολλούς σταθμούς εργασίας. Μικρής σημασίας βέβαια, αλλά πάλι λάθος.

Εκεί που γίνεται επίσης λάθος είναι η υπόθεση ότι αν κάτι δεν το βρεις παράνομα, θα το πληρώσεις. Αυτό είπε πχ για τους αγώνες, ότι, αν δεν μπορούν να το δούν, θα πάνε να το πληρώσουν. Δεν ισχύει. Και ο λόγος είναι απλός. Κάθε καταναλωτής έχει ένα πεπερασμένο ποσό που διαθέτει για την διασκέδασή του. Δεν πρόκειται να πληρώσει παραπάνω, γιατί απλά δεν έχει. Μάλιστα, ο νόμος που ψηφίστηκε είχε ως αιτιολογικό έναν οικονομικό υπολογισμό εντελώς γελοίο. Έχουν υπολογίσει ότι το κράτος χάνει το χρόνο 135 εκατομμύρια ευρώ σε φορολογικά έσοδα από την πειρατεία συνδρομητικών πλατφορμών. Την ίδια στιγμή, η φορολόγηση αυτή, σύμφωνα με τα στοιχεία της ΑΑΔΕ[2] (κωδικός R1150501001), επέφερε στο κράτος κάτι περισσότερο από 6 εκατομμύρια ευρώ το 2023. Δηλαδή υπολογίζουν ότι το κόστος της πειρατείας είναι 23 φορές μεγαλύτερο από τα υπάρχοντα έσοδα, κάτι που δε στέκει με καμία λογική.

Θα αναφέρουμε για ακόμα μία φορά ότι όσες μελέτες έχουν γίνει για το θέμα, έχουν βρεί ότι όσοι κατεβάζουν παράνομα αγοράζουν και περισσότερο περιεχόμενο νόμιμα από όσους δεν κατεβάζουν. Είναι και ο λόγος που η Ευρωπαϊκή Επιτροπή έκρυβε για χρόνια την μελέτη που η ίδια είχε παραγγείλει για την επίπτωση της πειρατείας στην βιομηχανία θεάματος και μουσικής[3]. Γιατί δεν προκύπτει ότι η πειρατεία προξενεί ζημία τόσο μεγάλη όσο ισχυρίζεται το λόμπι των εκδοτών. Αντίθετα, υπάρχουν περιπτώσεις όπου ο αντίκτυπός της είναι θετικός, καθώς επαναφέρει στο προσκήνιο, λειτουργώντας ως “δειγματοληψία ή δωρεάν διαφήμιση”, για υλικό που έχει αποσυρθεί από την κυκλοφορία και είναι, συνεπώς μη διαθέσιμο στην πρωτογενή αγορά. Δηλαδή μιλάμε για υλικό που, ως εκτός κυκλοφορίας, δεν παράγει κέρδος ούτε για τον εκδότη ούτε για τον δημιουργό.

Αυτό που είπε ο κ. Κουρεμένος και στο οποίο συμφωνούμε απόλυτα είναι ότι η πειρατεία (που δεν αφορά το κέρδος) έχει μειωθεί, γιατί υπάρχει πολύ διαθέσιμο περιεχόμενο χάρη στις συνδρομητικές πλατφόρμες. Μάλιστα, αυτό είναι και ένα από τα βασικά μας επιχειρήματα, με τη διαφορά ότι εμείς τασσόμαστε υπέρ του καταναλωτή. Το υλικό πρέπει να είναι διαθέσιμο προς αγορά: πραγματική αγορά, όχι “συνδρομή” και “πρόσβαση” για όσο χρονικό διάστημα κρίνει ο εκδότης, και μάλιστα σε λογικές τιμές και χωρίς τεχνολογίες περιορισμού των νόμιμων δικαιωμάτων του καταναλωτή. Διαφορετικά, δύο πράγματα θα συμβούν. Η θα χαθεί το περιεχόμενο, αφού δε θα εκδίδεται πλέον, ή θα αναγκάζονται να το κατεβάζουν παράνομα όσοι θέλουν να το δουν, να το διαβάσουν, να το χρησιμοποιήσουν ή να το ακούσουν. Φυσικά, το δεύτερο σημαίνει ότι θα βρεθούν κερδοσκόποι που θα το εκμεταλλευτούν για να αποκομίσουν οικονομικό όφελος σε βάρος των δημιουργών.

Πηγές:

  1. Griffiths, D. (2025). Spotify fights back: Think that artists aren’t getting enough cash? Spotify says there’s a good reason for that. [online] MusicRadar. Available at: https://www.musicradar.com/music-industry/spotify-fights-back-think-that-artists-arent-getting-enough-cash-spotify-say-theres-a-good-reason-for-that.
  2. Υπουργείο Εθνικής Οικονομίας και Οικονομικών. Απολογισμός Εσόδων-Εξόδων Κρατικού Προϋπολογισμού 2023 – Υπουργείο Εθνικής Οικονομίας και Οικονομικών. [online] Available at: https://minfin.gov.gr/apologismos-esodon-exodon-kratikou-proypologismou-2023/.
  3. Reda, F. What the Commission found out about copyright infringement but ‘forgot’ to tell us. [online] Felix Reda. Available at: https://felixreda.eu/2017/09/secret-copyright-infringement-study/.

Permanent link to this article: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/03/i-pirateia-den-antimetopizete-me-prostima/

Uprooting Neo-LePenism from The Pirate Movement

Several pirate ships laboring in a stormy sea near a cliff face.

In 2023, the 11th Congress of The Pirate Party of Greece approved a major update of its Statutes, taking significant steps towards clarifying our party’s ideological identity and giving it a clearly progressive direction. Among the amendments approved by the party’s Congress was the removal, from both the Statutes and the Founding Declaration, of the historically and politically illiterate reference that we do not place ourselves on the “obsolete” Left-Center-Right axis. This reference is a maxim that has hobbled the entire Pirate Movement since its beginning, as it still enjoys a fatwa-like status for most Pirate parties. Most Pirate parties’ leaderships still believe it gives them some sort of “flexibility” regarding the policies (especially fiscal ones) they will endorse in each political context, citing their desire to have a “context-dependent appeal”. 

This, however, has been proven to be a misguided approach. For starters, as has been repeatedly pointed out to us, both by outside political analysts and by party members familiar with European political history, this maxim is suspiciously similar to the French slogan “ni droite, ni gauche” (neither left nor right). This slogan was adopted and used prominently by the infamous and conniving French neo-fascist politician Jean-Marie Le Pen for his own party, the Front National, later rebranded as Rassemblement National. For many years, there were ample warnings by knowledgeable political commentators that this common element between our movement and the French fascist party would be harmful, not only regarding how our movement would be perceived by progressive citizens, but also regarding what elements it would attract. Indeed, we saw prominent Pirates resign from their national Parties and abandon our movement citing their leaderships’ unwillingness to tackle the incursion of Holocaust deniers, Gamergaters, racists, homotransphobes, alt-right grifters, islamophobes, and so on. In some cases, these elements managed to take over the parties they infected and turn their vile agenda into official party line.

By prioritizing this ill-conceived “flexibility” over the universal humanitarian, egalitarian, and democratic values the Pirate Movement ostensibly espouses, the Pirate parties that have chosen to cling to the “ni droite, ni gauche” slogan like limpets to a rock injected the venom of neo-LePenism into the Pirate Movement. This is how the aforementioned far-right factions managed to hijack various national Pirate parties. Once they had achieved this, they could derail he Pirate Movement from the progressive hacker ideals that were born in 2600: The Hacker Quarterly and spawned the Free and Open Source Software movement and the movement for the protection of individual and civil liberties in cyberspace. These factions turned our movement’s official declarations of adherence to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and the European Convention on Human Rights into empty, meaningless words, drowned by a cesspool of anti-feminist, anti-diversity, anti-equity, anti-inclusion, racist, genocidal, pro-Apartheid, pro-censorship rhetoric, taken from notorious sources of neo-fascist messaging and disinformation, like “Dr. Maalouf”, Peter “Sweden” Imanuelsen, Viségrad24, and Radio Genoa.

One might point out that the “ni droite, ni gauche” slogan was also used by “centrist” French President Emmanuel Macron  in his campaign, but this does nothing to overshadow its most (in)famous use. As a matter of fact, it only adds fuel to the fire, as Macron is notoriously averse to democracy. He is well-known for his violent crackdown on protests against his neoliberal fiscal policies; we Pirates remember his horse-trading with the German government to pass Articles 15 and 17 (formerly 11 and 13, respectively) of the EU Copyright Directive [(EU) 2019/790] that was uncovered by Felix Reda, the best politician our movement ever had. More recently, we remember him for causing a snap election, citing the dangerous rise of the fascist Marine Le Pen. And then, he conspired with Le Pen to install an unpopular, obsessive, and incompetent electoral loser as Prime Minister, sidestepping the popular vote, which favored the Left. If anything, the use of this particular slogan by Macron makes him a neo-LePenist; it does not make the slogan less politically repulsive.

Contrary to what has been shamelessly claimed by some, the Pirate Ideology is not a vague, nebulous concept that can somehow be made compatible with sexist, patriarchal, alt-right, white supremacist, neo-colonialist, anti-woke policies. It is a concrete ideological framework that promotes democracy, the rule of law, equality, equity, inclusion, freedom, social justice, peace, and safety for everyone, regardless of skin color, place of birth, religion, financial status, or political beliefs. To stay focused on these goals, we need to keep our political vision perfectly clear. Thus, we must close once and for all the backdoors that allowed the far right’s venom to find its way into our movement, and this is precisely what we did in 2023. 

True to the Pirate ideals, we are not going to stop there. Instead, we intend to continue our work to clarify and re-establish the vision of the Pirate Movement and restore its relevance and credibility. The Pirate Movement is inherently and innately progressive, democratic, egalitarian, and grassroots. Its true place is with the global progressive forces, from center-left and beyond; not with anti-democratic, reactionary forces like the European People’s Party and its far-right crutches. We know there are many Pirates around the world who share our desire to rebuild and recalibrate our movement. We cordially invite them to come with us so we can fight to curb the neo-fascist menace that threatens to undo every conquest in the field of human, civil, social, labor rights and freedoms, that threatens to destroy any sense of rule of law and any notion of democracy. 

Permanent link to this article: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/uprooting-neo-lepenism-from-the-pirate-movement/

Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Part 3

Translated from the original Greek-language post from September 2024.

Several pirate ships laboring in a stormy sea near a cliff face.

Even before the 2024 European Elections, which were an unmitigated disaster for the Pirate Movement, reading the Flaschenpost, the official news apparatus of the German Pirate Party’s (Piratenpartei Deutschland – PPDE)’s Politburo, confirmed what we suspected from reading the X (formerly Twitter) posts of several prominent members and officials of the party. What primarily gave the game away was a collection of “analyses”, written by the party’s intelligentsia and several like-minded scribes, full of context-free, laced with islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism, justifications for the genocide against Palestinians and the theft of their lands committed by the Israeli Apartheid. The arguments put forward were grotesque in their similarity to those employed by collaborationist newspapers in countries occupied by Germany in WW2 in order to justify the wholesale massacres of entire villages in “retaliation” against resistance militias.

Then, after the humiliating European Elections of 2024, came a series of diatribes regarding the causes of their abject electoral failure, which dragged the European Pirate Party (PPEU) along. In these, the PPDE’s actual leadership, the Bundesvorstand (Federal Executive Board), displayed a clear lack of self-reflection and complete unwillingness to accept responsibility for its political choices, its actions, and its failures. Instead, the PPDE’s Politburo opted to go with narratives like “we did not have enough money,” “we were not visible enough online,” “we did not have people in places where we could get voters,” and “we did not have time to engage on social media.”[1] It boggles the mind that they expect their members and voters to believe this. It becomes evident that the 0.50% they got was too generous.

That this was going to happen could be seen years before: the ship was heading at full speed towards jagged rocks, which were already known, were well-lit, recorded on the maps, marked by the ship’s radar, yet no one saw them. Such was the PPDE leadership’s faith in their choices. It is no coincidence that none of the PPDE’s policymakers felt the need to accept responsibility for the failure of both their party and the PPEU. Then, who was left to fall on his or her sword? The candidates, of course.

In reality, the PPDE has been ideologically and morally bankrupt for years now. Of course, none of its nomenklatura will admit it – they believe they are infallible, like the Pope once did. Their obsessive insistence on maintaining the historically baseless and suspiciously similar to the “ni droite, ni gauche” maxim of Jean-Marie Le Pen’s Front National avoidance of any specific political identity made it possible for outright fascists and Holocaust deniers[2] to infest the party. In 2017, another year of electoral decline for the PPDE, they lost voters to the neo-nazi AfD.[3] Yet, it seems no one wondered what such people were doing in a Pirate party and, of course, no one showed them the door before their toxic presence drove healthy members and officials out. We could be generous to the PPDE’s leaders and suppose they didn’t tell the AfD sympathizers that there’s no room for nazis in a Pirate party out of fear that this would constitute taking a positioning themselves on the left side of the “obsolete” Left-Center-Right axis, which remains an “anathema” for many Pirate parties.

But why are we saying the PPDE’s party officials believe they are infallible? First of all, despite their consecutive electoral failures, they have never reflected upon the political direction of the party. Yes, there have been reshuffles in the Bundesvorstand. Political directors, deputy political directors have stepped down. What did not change, however, was the party’s doctrine, which shows an unacceptable tolerance for far-right rhetoric to be transmitted by party members, often in such a manner that blurs the line between personal opinion and official party line. And if this doctrine has changed, the alt-right, anti-woke, misogynist, racist rants spewed by the likes of Max Kehm and Jan Sicars indicate a change for the much worse.

When a party claims to support human rights and the struggle against corruption, it cannot maintain its credibility when its members and officials go out and support the Palestinian genocide by the corrupt, neo-fascist Israeli apartheid regime. One automatically concludes that this party’s alleged opposition to corruption and human rights violations is a façade: for the PPDE, there are governments and states that are allowed to place themselves above and beyond International Law and trample it by massacring and torturing people, tearing the rule of law to shreds, maintaining a corrupt system of governance and supporting corruption and human rights violations in other states for profit (like Israel does with its extensive malware industry). And what are we supposed to think of a party whose members and officials support the vile, fascist agenda of grifters like the Canadian preacher of sexism and patron of misogynist terrorism Jordan Peterson or the completely insane Argentinean President Javier Milei? If PPDE was truly a progressive party, Kehm, Sicars, and their ilk would have been kicked out summarily and unceremoniously. This, however, has not happened, and shall not happen.

Then again, what are we expecting? This is a party that attempted (and failed), in the crudest of manners, to cover up a major sexual harassment scandal, whose perpetrator was Gilles Bordelais, a PPDE candidate for the 2019 European Elections. The party’s unwillingness to address this disgusting affair led Felix Reda, the most capable politician ever to grace any Pirate party, to resign from the PPDE and leave the Pirate movement altogether[4][5]. Any self-respecting party would have removed Bordelais from the ballot on the spot and take disciplinary action against him. The PPDE had all the information already in the summer of 2018, but chose to do nothing. Later, in the wake of Reda’s resignation, they tried to downplay the matter by saying that it did not matter that they kept him on the ballot, because the opinion polls showed he was unlikely to be elected anyway[6]. This line is utterly ridiculous and insulting to everyone’s intelligence, and we wonder how Patrick Breyer accepted to sign this announcement, permanently degrading himself by becoming the mouthpiece of a depraved party machine that should have been torn out years ago.

But the rancid Bordelais scandal was merely the continuation of another scandal, much more horrendous. In 2016, the PPDE was rocked by the case of its parliamentarian Gerwald Claus-Brunner[7]. Claus-Brunner, for all his colorful presence in the local Parliament and the media, was an extremely toxic man, who behaved in a vulgar and brutal manner even inside the party, spewed misogynistic slurs[8], and causing all sorts of trouble. His colleagues had even moved to dismiss him from the party. However, this motion was voted down, although other parties would not have tolerated his obscenities and bullying[9]. Then, things took an even darker and terrifying turn: on 19 September 2016, the next day of the – disastrous for the PPDE – elections in Berlin, Claus-Brunner was found dead. He had committed suicide, having first murdered a 29-year-old man he had been harassing for quite some time. The victim had reported Claus-Brunner to the authorities, but Claus-Brunner murdered him anyway[10].

In normal international and transnational political groups, parties riddled with scandals like the PPDE’s would have ended up marginalized and even expelled. How they managed, despite their complete inability to keep their own house in order, to maintain their status within the Pirate Parties International (PPI) is hard to fathom. We cannot imagine how any decent human being would choose, after these two malodorous scandals, to remain in a party that did nothing to prevent the worst, but tried to cover it all up and gaslight everyone after the fact. και να μην το εξαφανίσουν οριστικά. We are even more puzzled by how these scandals did not destroy the PPDE’s long-term campaign to become the dominant party within the PPI and impose its own agenda on the whole Pirate movement[11][12]. As Andrew Norton, one of the earliest members and officials of the US Pirate Party narrates[13], this campaign had started as far back as 2020, and already a lot had started to go downhill.

The machinations escalated and reached their peak with the riots of 24 May 2023, instigated by two PPDE Delegates in a meeting of the PPI’s Board as part of the PPDE’s “jihad” against Ms. Florie Marie, then-chairwoman of the PPI[12]. As we have already mentioned, Mr. Sebastian Krone και Ms. Utz were rewarded for their unethical and violent behavior. This, combined with the previous scandals, causes us to question the moral fiber of the entire party machine of the PPDE. These questions become even more burning if we take into account the PPDE’s turn to the alt-right, its openly racist stance against the illegally occupied Palestine, its contempt towards the United Nations, its participation in the amplification of libels against UNRWA, the International Court of Justice, and the International Criminal Court. Still, for at least fourteen years, the PPI and the PPEU have been manhandled and strong-armed by the PPDE without – apparently – anyone raising an eyebrow. Why?

It is true that several initial successes of the PPDE helped it become a leading force in the Pirate Movement. Its close collaboration with EDRi (European Digital Rights) and Netzpolitik, its role in bringing forward the Schrems II case, and the betrayed struggle against Article 15 (formerly 11) και Article 17 (formerly13) of EU Directive 2019/790 on intellectual property rights helped it quite a bit. Meanwhile, and until the critical period (final quarter of 2019 and first quarter of 2019), few national Pirate parties had remained active to make much of an impact in the final outcome. The reasons for the decline of many national Pirate parties will be examined in another analysis. What we do know is that the PPDE, aided by Germany’s relatively generous legislation regarding the state funding of political parties, maintained a strong momentum and an extensive network of offices, webpages, and infrastructures that allow it to organize events, recruit members and, thus, avoid or delay its final collapse. And all this, despite the fact that it was on its way out of having a parliamentary presence in Germany as early as 2015.

Perhaps many Pirates outside Germany, seeing their national parties fall apart, clung on to their German counterparts. Does this show some resignation and delegation? Does this show that, instead of taking the initiative to rebuild their parties, they relied on the Germans to represent them? Yes. It is understandable. Of all national Pirate parties, only the German and the Czech ones have consistently campaigned to be elected in the European Parliament, whose role in the Ordinary Legislative Procedure of the European Union is crucial. Perhaps this caused them to support these two parties, instead of trying to regroup, reorganize, and rebuild their national parties. Why they did not do so is anyone’s guess. We can, however, relatively safety think of a few reasons, from our own experience. Perhaps some parties diluted their ideological and political profile by entering into coalitions with parties incompatible with the Pirate ideology; perhaps these parties ended up being led by inept officials who frustrated their members and voters; other Pirate parties may have become vehicles for the ambitions of a certain clique that did not care about the party at all. And so on.

With so many Pirate parties having faded into oblivion, the PPDE seemed like a lighthouse in the hurricane. But how long can one rest on past laurels? Or use them as some sort of papal indulgence? The PPDE’s aforementioned scandals, its lewd entanglement with the alt-right and the “anti-woke” septic tank, and its suspiciously unconditional support to Israel’s criminal apartheid regime create for it a portrait that cannot be beautified in any way. In short, anyone equipped with the fundamental principles of democracy, humanity, even basic human decency and dignity would say that the PPDE now lacks any moral legitimacy to lead the Pirate Movement or point the finger and lecture other parties on what a Pirate is. Still, as we saw in the PPI’s board, it manages, with the tolerance and cooperation of other parties, to perpetuate its stranglehold on our ideological space, exploiting every method, no matter how irregular, undemocratic, or immoral.

But is it unfair to bring back the Claus-Brunner and Bordelais scandals from the memory hole after so many years? No. Unfortunately, the PPDE’s stance against the members that protested Claus-Brunner’s misogyny and bullying is evidence of systemic misogyny. It shows that the party did not want to discipline its parliamentarian, not only because he was their “face” to the outside world, but because these complaints came from women. We know full well how women are treated in the Infromation Technology sector, and we know it firsthand. The PPDE’s laborious effort to postpone and sabotage every attempt to remove Bordelais from the ballot leads us to the exact same conclusion. The brutal, vulgar, sexist behavior of PPDE’s delegates against Ms Marie makes us understand that nothing has changed since then. Instead, we saw PPDE politicians, within the context of the party’s unconditional support to the crimes against humanity committed by the Israeli apartheid regime against the Palestinians, “enrich” their racist ramblings with attacks against the feminist and LGBTQI+ movements, adopting slogans and vocabulary lifted straight from the alt-right cesspool.

In the issues we have documented here, we, the Pirate Party of Greece, see all the symptoms of a gangrene within the PPDE. So far, there is no sign whatsoever that its leadership, at a local or national level, is willing to acknowledge and treat it. On the contrary, we see PPDE politicians insulting our intelligence to excuse the inexcusable, to act in utter arrogance and stooping down to the level of propagating libels against entire peoples. We see PPDE’s old “glories” weaponized to give it a free pass and legitimize the prolongation of its hegemony in the Pirate Movement. However, the PPDE, with its Politburo being exclusively and wholly responsible, has lost any moral and political legitimacy to speak on our behalf, to interpret the Pirate Ideology, or lecture other Pirate parties as to whether they can be called “Pirate” or not. In fact, it has become an anchor tied to the whole Pirate Movement. The longer it continues to control the PPI and the PPEU, the further it will lead the Pirate Movement into ideological, moral, and political derailment; this, in turn, will make the Pirate Movement’s electoral annihilation and place it at grave existential risk.

Πηγές:
[1] Spengler, A. (2024). Interview mit Piratenpartei-Chefin: Die Spitzenkandidatin im Gespräch. [online] www.schwaebische.de. Available at: https://www.schwaebische.de/regional/ulm-alb-donau/ulm/die-rechten-haben-die-aengste-der-menschen-geschuert-2612613.
[2] Huetlin, J. (2016). The Rise and Fall of the Pirate Party. [online] The New Republic. Available at: https://newrepublic.com/article/137305/rise-fall-pirate-party.
[3] Backes, L. (2017). Alle Versenkt. Der Spiegel. [online] 24 Mar. Available at: https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/piratenpartei-selten-hat-sich-eine-partei-so-schnell-ueberfluessig-gemacht-a-1140369.html.
[4] Prager, A. (2019). EU Parliament failed to address sexual harassment, says outgoing Pirate Party star. [online] www.euractiv.com. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/german-parliament-administration-failed-to-address-sexual-harrassment-says-julia-reda-former-rising-star-of-germany-pirate-party/.
[5] Reda, F. (2019). Warum die Piraten zur Europawahl unwählbar sind: Kandidat Gilles Bordelais. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2qS56P-7kA.‌
[6] Breyer, P. (2019). Erklärung betreffend die Liste der Piratenpartei zur Europawahl 2019 [ergänzt am 24.03.2021]. [online] Available at: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/erklaerung-betreffend-die-liste-der-piratenpartei-zur-europawahl-2019/.
[7] BBC News. (2016). Berlin Pirate politician Claus-Brunner in ‘murder-suicide’. [online] BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37428122 [Accessed 24 Aug. 2024].
[8] Beikler, S. (2016). Zoff in Piratenfraktion in Berlin: Antrag auf Ausschluss von Claus-Brunner scheitert. [online] Tagesspiegel.de. Available at: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/antrag-auf-ausschluss-von-claus-brunner-scheitert-5204989.html [Accessed 27 Aug. 2024].
[9] Meiritz, A. (2016). Gerwald Claus-Brunner: Pirat deutete Todesgedanken in Parlamentsrede an. [online] Spiegel.de. Available at: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/pirat-gerwald-claus-brunner-parlament-war-schon-laenger-alarmiert-a-1112987.html [Accessed 27 Aug. 2024].
[10] Meiritz, A. (2016). Toter Piraten-Politiker Gerwald Claus-Brunner: Fall gelöst, Fragen offen. [online] Spiegel.de. Available at: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/gerwald-claus-brunner-ermittlungen-werden-eingestellt-a-1113493.html [Accessed 27 Aug. 2024].
[11] Pirate Party of Greece (2024). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Part 2. Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/quo-vaditis-piratae-part-2/ [Accessed 14 Feb. 2024].
[12] Pirate Party of Greece (2024). Quo Vaditis, Piratae? – Part 1. Κόμμα Πειρατών Ελλάδας – Pirate party of Greece. [online] Available at: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/01/quo-vaditis-piratae-part-1/ [Accessed 01 Feb. 2024].
‌[13] Norton, A. (2015). Andrew Norton: PPI Became a Pirate Chimera [Pirate Visions] | PirateTimes. [online] Archived at: https://web.archive.org/web/20150315164041/http://piratetimes.net/andrew-norton-ppi-became-a-pirate-chimera-pirate-visions/ [Accessed 30 Jun. 2024].

#altright #GerwaldClausBrunner #GillesBordelais #PiratenparteiDeutschland #PPDE #PiratePartiesInternational #PPI #Camarilla #PirateMovement

Permanent link to this article: https://www.pirateparty.gr/2025/02/quo-vaditis-piratae-part-3/